A Seligman-Style Tableau System
نویسندگان
چکیده
Proof systems for hybrid logic typically use @-operators to access information hidden behind modalities; this labeling approach lies at the heart of most resolution, natural deduction, and tableau systems for hybrid logic. But there is another, less well-known approach, which we have come to believe is conceptually clearer. We call this Seligman-style inference, as it was first introduced and explored by Jerry Seligman in the setting of natural deduction and sequent calculus in the late 1990s. The purpose of this paper is to introduce a Seligman-style tableau system. The most obvious feature of Seligman-style systems is that they work with arbitrary formulas, not just formulas prefixed by @-operators. To achieve this in a tableau system, we introduce a rule called GoTo which allows us to “jump to a named world” on a tableau branch, thereby creating a local proof context (which we call a block) on that branch. To the surprise of some of the authors (who have worked extensively on developing the labeling approach) Seligman-style inference is often clearer: not only is the approach more modular, individual proofs can be more direct. We briefly discuss termination and extensions to richer logics, and relate our system to Seligman’s original sequent calculus.
منابع مشابه
Completeness and termination for a Seligman-style tableau system
Proof systems for hybrid logic typically use @-operators to access information hidden behind modalities; this labelling approach lies at the heart of the best known hybrid resolution, natural deduction, and tableau systems. But there is another approach, which we have come to believe is conceptually clearer. We call this Seligman-style inference, as it was first introduced and explored by Jerry...
متن کاملSynthetic completeness proofs for Seligman-style tableau systems
Hybrid logic is a form of modal logic which allows reference to worlds. We can think of it as ‘modal logic with labelling built into the object language’ and various forms of labelled deduction have played a central role in its proof theory. Jerry Seligman’s work [13,14] in which ‘rules involving labels’ are rejected in favour of ‘rules for all’ is an interesting exception to this. Seligman’s a...
متن کاملExplanatory Style as a Mechanism of Disappointing Athletic Performance
Two university varsity swimming teams took the Attributional Style Questionnaire (ASQ) at the start of the season. Swimmers with a pessimistic explanatory style wellt on to show more unexpected poor performances during competition titan optimistic swimmers. We then tested the purported mechanism of this effect by experimentally simulating defeat, giving each swimmer falsely negative' times. Per...
متن کاملRelevant Analytic Tableaux
Tableau formulations are given for the relevance logics E (Entail? ment), R (Eelevant implication) and RM (Mingle). Proofs of equivalence to modus-ponens-based formulations are via" left-handed" Gentzen sequenzen-kalk?le. The tableau formulations depend on a detailed analysis of the structure of tableau rules, leading to certain "global requirements". Eelevanceis caught by the requirement that ...
متن کاملReasoning in Description Logic with Semantic Tableau Binary Trees
An alternative version of the tableau decision making algorithm defined in the ”Handbook of Description Logics” (Baader et col.) is presented. It is a version of semi-decidable tableau formal system that corresponds with that one of first order logic and shares its semantic soundness and completeness. In examples the advantages of the transparent tree-style representation algorithm, comparing w...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013